Keeping Green When Keeping House

Written by Theresa Brigleb on Friday, July 24, 2009

Cleaning your home shouldn’t involve wholesale destruction of our environment.  This amazing article was written by James Glave, Cyberhomes Contributor
Published: July 10, 2009.  So directly related to my favorite subject, Indoor Air Quality!


Shortly after the Second World War, America decided that the old ways of cleaning house simply weren’t cutting it anymore. With the availability of new chemicals and the advent of television marketing, a vision of a new clean emerged — an ever-whiter-and-brighter, utterly flawless, 100-percent-sterile spic-and-span kitchen and bath utopia.

The problem: The dream called for frequent and generous applications of chlorine, ammonia, lye and phosphates. Sometimes, when push came to shove, it demanded acetone, formaldeyde and phosphoric acid. Household-cleaner manufacturers didn’t and largely still don’t list these ingredients on their labels — some states are only now starting to require them to do so — but to ease any potential concern, they marketed their potions with bright colors and reassuring fragrances such as “mountain forest.”


There are many good reasons to now revisit this toxic dream and start thinking a little more green. The environmental legal group EarthJustice has exposed links between chemicals found in common household cleaners and respiratory irritation, asthma and allergies. Then there’s the aquatic and marine life to consider, which marinates in our happy-housewife cocktail at the far end of your pipe.

Myriad effective yet vastly more responsible green cleaning options now exist. Brands such as Seventh Generation, Ecover and 365 — the Whole Foods private label — offer cleaning products largely derived from plant-based sources. And America is taking notice; some of these companies report 40 percent annual growth. However, even the all-natural bucket-and-mop brigade sometimes has its challenges.

This recently came to light when the Organic Consumers Association watchdog group released test results revealing measurable levels of the carcinogen 1,4-dioxane in cleaners made by popular “natural” brands. Those companies quickly reformulated to remove the offending compound — a previously undisclosed byproduct of the process used to transform plant oils into grease cutters. But despite the minimal price premiums these products demand over their neon-hued brethren, and odd missteps like the 1,4-dioxane goof, you’re still doing better for all of us if you choose a green cleaning product at the store.

Put your hands together for acetic acid and sodium bicarbonate, more commonly known as vinegar and baking soda. While neither will kill bacteria, they will take care of most household grime without requiring you to hang an OSHA safety card on the laundry-room cupboard. Add water and use baking soda (about $2 a box) as a paste; vinegar (also about $2 for a bottle) works as a straight solution. And by the way, before you go calling us purists, it’s OK to use diluted bleach occasionally where disinfection is needed.

 

Hows President Obama doing on his energy and efficiency promises?

Written by Theresa Brigleb on Tuesday, July 21, 2009

I found this interesting article in Greenzine written on July 13th, 2009 by Jeff McIntire-Strasburg

The House’s passage of Waxman-Markey (aka the American Clean Energy and Security Act) isn’t just a step forward in moving the United States away from addiction to fossil fuels, and towards a cleaner energy economy; it’s also evidence that President Barack Obama plans to fight for many of the campaign promises he made on energy and the environment. Candidate Obama laid out a very ambitious and comprehensive approach to energy policy, recognizing that it’s intimately tied to environmental concerns and economic growth and development. Among the policies promoted by the Obama-Biden campaign:

Tackling climate change through implementation of a cap-and-trade system, and making the US a leader on addressing global warming.
Investing in clean energy and energy security (and creating 5 million jobs in the process.
Promoting clean, efficient cars and trucks.
Increasing our commitment to energy efficiency.


So, how’s President Obama doing on energy and efficiency?
In short, not bad. Numerous evaluations on the topic came out around the 100-day mark of his presidency, and most were positive. Dave Burdick of The Huffington Post said the president was off to a good start on securing his legacy as a “green president.” Joseph Romm, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, gave Obama an A+, and noted that historians may regard him as “the green FDR.”

The St. Petersburg Times‘ Politifact.com site keeps a running tally of promises made, and progress on those promises. Among those the president has kept on energy issues:

Weatherizing 1 million low-income homes every year.
Providing grants to encourage energy-efficient building codes.
Enacting a consumer tax credit for plug-in hybrid cars.


Obama’s made progress on promises involving green jobs creation, raising fuel economy standards, and requiring more energy-efficient appliances.

Energy Efficiency: the cheapest, cleanest, fastest energy source
That’s how the Obama-Biden campaign described efficiency in a speech brief on energy policy. Clearly, President Obama is taking many right steps towards leveraging efficiency as a part of broader national energy policy.

Make sure that you let the President, and his Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, know that you approve of such measures, and want to see more. Join Earthjustice and Sundance’s THE UNITED STATES OF EFFICIENCY campaign, and add your name to a letter asking Secretary Chu to adopt “the strongest achievable efficiency standards” as a part of making the US more energy secure. We’re on the track… let’s not get off course!

Image credit: White House photographer Charles Watkins via Wikimedia Commons

Homelessness in Suburbs &  Rural Areas increases

Written by Theresa Brigleb on Friday, July 10, 2009

By Wendy Koch, USA TODAY

As the recession took hold last year, homelessness shifted toward rural and suburban areas and gripped a growing number of families, the U.S. government reports today.
The number of homeless people receiving shelter, 1.6 million, was largely unchanged from 2007, but the number of those in families rose 9% from about 473,000 to 517,000, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development report. The figures are for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30.

The number of homeless people in rural and suburban shelters jumped sharply: 32% of all people in shelters compared with 23% in 2007.

“This report dispels the myth that homelessness is exclusively an urban problem,” says HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan. “Today’s housing crisis is putting particular pressure on families with children who are living in suburbs and rural areas.”

The HUD report is the first with full-year figures for more than one year. It is based on information collected in 222 communities, including one-day tallies of people living on the street and in shelters as well as annual figures on those in shelters or transitional housing.

“We’re seeing early signs of the recession in this report,” says co-author Dennis Culhane, a University of Pennsylvania professor who studies homelessness. Families are more likely than individuals to be affected by the economy because they are more apt to have held jobs, he says.

States on the West Coast — most affected by the foreclosure crisis — have the highest share of their population living on the street or in shelters, Culhane notes.

HUD also released first-quarter 2009 shelter counts for three cities and four regions, finding both increases and declines. In New York City, the number of homeless people in families receiving shelter rose from 28,746 in January to 31,481 in March.

“Since school let out, our shelter requests have increased even more,” says Robert Hess, commissioner of the city’s Department of Homeless Services. Requests are up 40% from last year.

He says the city will soon begin receiving some of its $74 million in federal funding to prevent homelessness by helping people pay rent, utilities and security deposits.

Most Searched Site for Homes - Realtor.com

Written by Theresa Brigleb on Thursday, July 09, 2009

A blog posting by Heather Hopkins, analyst for Hitwise, a company that measures Web traffic, showed that Google was not among the top 10 real estate Web sites in the week ending July 4. Realtor.com, the National Association of Realtors’ site, had the biggest number of visits by far, with 7.6 percent of all real estate site visits. Zillow came in second, with 3.7 percent. Then came Yahoo real estate and Zip Realty, each with about 2.9 percent, and Trulia and Rent.com, each with 2 percent. Rounding out the top 10 were RE/MAX Real Estate, Homegain, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and Homes.com, each with less than 2 percent of all visits to real estate sites.

6 Upsides of the Down Economy

Written by Theresa Brigleb on Wednesday, July 01, 2009

An interesting article by Jeff Yeager I found in the EcoBroker newsletter this week:

The recession may have a silver lining in the form of better quality of life. Learn how to save money and live well.

My father-in-law had a saying: “If you don’t have a good time, you usually learn a good lesson.” I’m reminded of that a lot these days during the current economic recession.

I’m not saying that the economic downturn is a good thing, particularly for people who have lost jobs or their homes. But fortunately that’s not most Americans. For the rest of us, some involuntary belt tightening might have some silver linings. In other words, I think the current market corrections we’re going through might just trigger some long overdue — and ultimately very positive — lifestyle corrections for many Americans.

Consider:

* We’re borrowing less and putting more into savings. We’ve truly learned a lesson — albeit the hard way — about living beyond our means. In 2008, savings rates rose to 1.7%, coming off the lowest savings rates since the Great Depression. And figures recently released for April 2009 are even more impressive, showing the personal savings rate for the month at a 14-year-high of 5.7%.

* We’re wasting less. AKA Using it up, making it last, doing without. This is clear from the increase in thrift store and re-sale store sales. Goodwill Store revenues in February were up 7.2% over last year, and for the first time in generations, many thrift stores are selling their wares faster than additional merchandise is being donated.

* We’re building smaller homes. It’s bad for your bank account and bad for the environment to construct, heat, cool, electrify, decorate, maintain and pay taxes and insurance on unnecessary square footage. For the first time in more than 10 years, the average size of new homes being built dropped by nearly 300 square feet, or 11%. Studies show that we, as humans, are inherently uncomfortable living in too large of spaces, and the recent economy has shown that we’re definitely uncomfortable trying to pay for them. In with “Not So Big” and “Little Boxes”!

* We’re driving less and staying around home more. When gas was at $4 a gallon, two-thirds of Americans said they changed their habits and drove less…and nothing awful happened because of it. It save resources, generates less pollution, and, because we’re spending more time closer to home, it stands to bring our families and communities closer together. That’s why I still continue to pay $4 a gallon at the pump, or, rather, pay myself the difference in my “$4 a Gallon Savings Club.”

* We’re eating lower on the food chain, which is usually healthier. Sales of poultry are up, red meat are down. We’re buying more staples, and fewer processed foods. We’re eating more fruits and vegetables, and raising a lot more of those ourselves: Home vegetable gardens are projected to be up 40% this year compared to 2007. If these trends continue, the next dire headline out of the recession might just be “American Obesity Epidemic Declines!”

* Hard times might help to revitalize local businesses/economies. In the long run, it stands to reason that the current recession might actually help to revitalize long struggling local businesses and economies. Consider these factors: * Transporting products from far away becomes less cost effective, making the produce at local farmers’ markets, for example, more cost competitive. * Big national chains are going under in record numbers, opening the door to local/independent businesses. * Local businesses are more responsive to changing demands and have fewer, if any, demands by shareholders for higher returns on investment. * And many local communities, like those in the Berkshire region of Massachusetts, are taking matters into their own hands and finding creative ways to help local business not just survive, but thrive.

Check out Jeff Yeager talking about saving money on ABC News Now
Jeff Yeager is the author of the book The Ultimate Cheapskate’s Road Map to True Riches. His Website is http://www.UltimateCheapskate.com.


Read more: http://www.thedailygreen.com/living-green/blogs/save-money/how-to-save-money-recession-460609?src=nl&mag=tdg&list=dgr#ixzz0K2PUZqPu&C